MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059186437 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2009.2023658

Selective Harmonic Elimination in Multimodule Three-Phase Current-Source Converters

2009· article· en· W2059186437 on OpenAlexaff
Johan I. Guzman, José Espinoza, L. Morán, G. Joós

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvertersHarmonicsModular designElectronic engineeringHarmonicHarmonic analysisComputer scienceModulation (music)VoltageNotationPower (physics)Current sourceVoltage sourceTopology (electrical circuits)Electrical engineeringEngineeringMathematicsArithmeticPhysicsProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modular current-source converter (MCSC) structures can enhance the current capacity and improve the power quality of converters in medium-voltage pulsewidth-modulated applications. An MCSC uses individual three-phase modules in a shunt connection to share the total power in a symmetrical manner. The modulation of these units is normally done using optimized patterns such as selective harmonic elimination patterns. However, the optimization is usually performed at the module level. This paper proposes a modulation technique that optimizes the operation of a complete MCSC taking into account all$P$modules. Thus, from the injected ac current, we remove$P$times the number of harmonics as compared with the conventional approach using the same switching frequency. A complete mathematical formulation and experimental results validate the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207