MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059200212 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2013-0533

On the interaction between two point electric charges

2014· preprint· en· W2059200212 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2014
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum and Classical Electrodynamics
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoulombPhysicsVacuum polarizationElectric potentialPolarization (electrochemistry)Electric chargeScatteringQuantum electrodynamicsPoint (geometry)Electric fieldClassical mechanicsQuantum mechanicsElectronVoltageMathematicsGeometryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The general formula for the interaction potential between two point electric charges that contains the lowest order corrections to the vacuum polarization is derived and investigated. Analytical derivation of this formula is based on the closed analytical expression for the Uehling potential obtained earlier. Our analytical formula has the correct asymtotic behaviour at small and large distances between two interacting electric charges. We also discuss a number of problems that are of great interest in applications, such as, vacuum polarization corrections to the Coulomb scattering and cusp value between two electrically charged particles. An original algebraic procedure developed in this study allows one to determine consecutive corrections for vacuum polarization for Coulomb systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.837

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it