MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059201461 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.83.057001

Frame dependence of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>transverse<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math>response functions at intermediate momentum transfers

2011· article· lv· W2059201461 on OpenAlexaff
V.D. Efros, Winfried Leidemann, Giuseppina Orlandini, E. L. Tomusiak

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review C · 2011
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersRussian Foundation for Basic Research
KeywordsOmegaPhysicsFunction (biology)Frame (networking)Quantum mechanicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transverse electron scattering response function of $^{3}\mathrm{He}$ was recently studied by us in the quasielastic peak region for momentum transfers $q$ between 500 and 700 MeV/$c$. Those results, obtained using the active nucleon Breit (ANB) frame, are here supplemented by calculations in the laboratory, Breit, and ANB frames using the two-fragment model discussed in our earlier work on the frame dependence of the longitudinal response function ${R}_{L}(q,\ensuremath{\omega})$. We find relatively frame-independent results and good agreement with experiment especially for the lower momentum transfers. This agreement occurs when we neglect an $\ensuremath{\omega}$-dependent piece of the one-body current relativistic correction. Inclusion of this term leads, however, to a rather pronounced frame dependence at $q=700$ MeV/$c$. A discussion of this term is given here. This report also includes a correction to our previous ANB results for ${R}_{T}(q,\ensuremath{\omega})$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.009
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0080.008
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1510.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207