MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2059212134 · doi:10.7202/044578ar

Le voyageur sans ticket ou J’ai fait du théâtre parce que ça m’amusait

2010· article· fr· W2059212134 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jean-Louis Barsacq

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes littéraires · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

De deux brefs manuscrits d’Anouilh, il est fait une seule et unique pièce dont le titre aurait pu être Le procès, si Kafka y avait consenti. Dans le premier manuscrit, l’inculpé se nomme Jean Anouilh, dans l’autre il s’agit d’un certain Gaëtan Biscayes. Dans les deux cas, l’homme est accusé d’avoir raté sa vie. Le procureur nous apprend qu’Anouilh ou Biscayes, il devra répondre d’un grave et multiple échec : échec social, échec professionnel, échec familial et sentimental et enfin, échec métaphysique. Il émane de ce texte reconstruit et sans doute incomplet une vision anouilhesque du monde, à la fois cocasse, mélancolique, et parfois franchement sinistre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.009
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes littéraires→Same topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research→French-language works237,207→