MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059213224 · doi:10.4271/2013-01-0527

Impact of Ambient Temperature on Gaseous and Particle Emissions from a Direct Injection Gasoline Vehicle and its Implications on Particle Filtration

2013· article· en· W2059213224 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE international journal of fuels and lubricants · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle emissions and performance
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersGovernment of Canada
KeywordsGasolineGasoline direct injectionParticle (ecology)Environmental scienceFiltration (mathematics)Waste managementAutomotive engineeringParticulatesEnvironmental engineeringChemistryEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Gaseous and particle emissions from a gasoline direct injection (GDI) and a port fuel injection (PFI) vehicle were measured at various ambient temperatures (22°C, -7°C, -18°C). These vehicles were driven over the U.S. Federal Test Procedure 75 (FTP-75) and US06 Supplemental Federal Test Procedure (US06) on Tier 2 certification gasoline (E0) and 10% by volume ethanol (E10). Emissions were analyzed to determine the impact of ambient temperature on exhaust emissions over different driving conditions. Measurements on the GDI vehicle with a gasoline particulate filter (GPF) installed were also made to evaluate the GPF particle filtration efficiency at cold ambient temperatures. The GDI vehicle was found to have better fuel economy than the PFI vehicle at all test conditions. Reduction in ambient temperature increased the fuel consumption for both vehicles, with a much larger impact on the cold-start FTP-75 drive cycle observed than for the hot-start US06 drive cycle. Colder ambient temperatures were also found to increase CO, THC, and particle emissions over the FTP-75 drive cycle, with little impact on the emissions over the US06 drive cycle. E10 was found to decrease particle number emissions from the PFI vehicle over both test cycles and all ambient temperatures. E10 almost always led to higher particle emissions from the GDI vehicle, except over the FTP-75 drive cycle at standard temperature. Limited soot regeneration in the GPF was observed at cold ambient temperatures over the FTP-75 drive cycle. However, the particle filtration efficiency of the GPF did not significantly change during cold ambient testing. On average, the mass-based GPF filtration efficiency over the FTP-75 drive cycle was observed to vary from 62% at standard temperature to 92% at -18°C. When based on particle number, the GPF filtration efficiency varied from 85% at standard temperature to 80% at -18°C. Over the US06 drive cycle, multiple spontaneous soot regenerations were observed and led to lower particle filtration efficiency. Mass-based filtration efficiency of the GPF was found to vary from 36% at standard temperature to 52% at -18°C. Number-based filtration efficiency varied from 83% at standard temperature to 60% at -18°C.</div></div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.876
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it