MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059222106 · doi:10.1177/0148607110378017

Specialty Residency Training in Medical Nutrition Education

2010· article· en· W2059222106 on OpenAlexaff
Mark H. DeLegge, Sharon A Alger-Mayer, Charles W. Van Way, Leah Gramlich

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicObesity and Health Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpecialtyMedicineTraining (meteorology)Medical educationCurriculumCredentialingNutrition EducationResidency trainingClinical nutritionGraduate medical educationFamily medicineGerontologyPsychologyContinuing educationPedagogyAccreditationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nutrition education among residents in training is at a critical juncture. There is a general lack of a unified curriculum, a lack of nutrition physician mentors, and a failure to properly train physicians about nutrition. In surveys, residents in training have acknowledged their minimal nutrition education. Published data and training experiences suggest the importance of creating physician mentors in nutrition who are embedded in residency training programs. The development of recurrent short-term nutrition credentialing courses and online nutrition tool kits is also thought to be important in future residency training.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.400 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Parenteral and Enteral NutritionSame topicObesity and Health PracticesFrench-language works237,207