MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059240489 · doi:10.1081/erc-200044048

On the Control of the h<i>CYP11B2</i>Gene Expressing Cytochrome P450 Aldosterone Synthase

2004· article· en· W2059240489 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Guy Lehoux, Andrée Lefèbvre

Bibliographic record

VenueEndocrine Research · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJUNBAldosterone synthaseMAPK/ERK pathwayAngiotensin IIAldosteroneMolecular biologyEndocrinologyActivator (genetics)ChemistryInternal medicineBiologyTranscription factorSignal transductionReceptorRenin–angiotensin systemGeneCell biologyBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have previously reported that the protein kinase C ligand 12-O-tetradecanoyphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) inhibited the angiotensin II (AII) stimulated CYP11B2 gene expression in the adrenocortical H295R cell line. Here we report that TPA increased the level of phospho-p44/42 MAPK but AII did not. The MEK1 inhibitor PD98059 was found to increase the level of aldosterone synthase mRNA and the activity of a human CYP11B2(-2023 bp)-promoter construct. The cotransfection of H295R with ERK 1 and the hCYP11B2 promoter resulted in the inhibition of the promoter activity. TPA but not AII increased the level of the transcription factor JunB in nuclear extracts and the increase was partially abolished by the MEK1 inhibitor PD98059. The cotransfection of H295R with JunB and the hCYP11B2 promoter abolished the AII stimulating effect. Taken together these results suggest that TPA inhibits the AII-dependent activation of CYP11B2 via the p44/42 MAPK signaling pathway leading to an increase of the level of nuclear JunB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEndocrine ResearchSame topicHormonal Regulation and HypertensionFrench-language works237,207