MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059247670 · doi:10.1080/13647830.2010.535566

Applying nonlinear dynamic theory to one-dimensional pulsating detonations

2011· article· en· W2059247670 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCombustion Theory and Modelling · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and Detonation Processes
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorrelation dimensionAttractorDimension (graph theory)DetonationNonlinear systemCascadeStatistical physicsCorrelation integralCHAOS (operating system)Chaos theoryPhysicsMathematicsClassical mechanicsMathematical analysisChaoticCorrelationComputer scienceFractal dimensionExplosive materialGeometryPure mathematicsQuantum mechanicsFractal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dynamical behaviour of one-dimensional pulsating detonations was investigated in detail, with the aid of nonlinear theory tools such as phase plots and correlation dimension. The period-doubling cascade, as routes to deterministic chaos, is depicted through the transformations of the shapes of the attractors. Using a correlation dimension method, the dimension of the attractors is determined and we show that the chaos within a one-dimensional pulsating detonation is deterministic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.737

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it