MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059292466 · doi:10.3140/bull.geosci.1298

Emsian-Eifelian lingulate brachiopods from the Daleje-Třebotov Formation (Třebotov and Suchomasty limestones) and the Choteč Formation (Choteč and Acanthopyge limestones) from the Prague Basin; the Czech Republic

2012· article· en· W2059292466 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Michal Mergl, Stanislava Vodrážková

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Geosciences · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Formations and Processes Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersČeská geologická službaGrantová Agentura České RepublikyUniversität ZürichMacquarie UniversityUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsGeologyCzechPaleontologyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EmsianEifelian lingulate brachiopods from the Daleje-Tøebotov Formation (Tøebotov and Suchomasty limestones) and the Choteè Formation (Choteè and Acanthopyge limestones) from the Prague Basin; the Czech Republic MICHAL MERGL & STANISLAVA VODRÁKOVÁ Taxonomic composition and stratigraphic distribution of lingulate brachiopod taxa around the Emsian/Eifelian boundary of the Prague Basin were examined.Twelve species have been determined and the presence of others is suggested.The prevalence of micromorphic biernatids, Havlicekion and Opsiconidion, in all the studied samples is significant.A mode of life for biernatids, especially from the genus Opsiconidion, is discussed.A new Devonian occurrence of the siphonotretid Orbaspina is recorded.Lingulate brachiopods do not display any significant change around the Emsian/Eifelian boundary or at the Basal Choteč Event (Middle Devonian, Eifelian, costatus Zone) and thus confirm the general uniformity of lingulate faunas in the Lower and early Middle Devonian.•

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of GeosciencesSame topicGeological Formations and Processes ExplorationFrench-language works237,207