MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059304646 · doi:10.1109/icc.2012.6364038

Efficient erasure marking technique for interleaving delay reduction in DSL systems impaired by impulse noise

2012· article· en· W2059304646 on OpenAlexaff
Yuxin Zhao, Khuong Ho‐Van, Tho Le‐Ngoc

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Communications and Noise
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterleavingErasureComputer scienceDigital subscriber lineDecoding methodsErasure codeImpulse noiseReal-time computingComputer networkAlgorithmArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reed-Solomon (RS) coding and interleaving are usually combined to protect digital subscriber line (DSL) systems against impulse noise (IN) but introducing a long delay. It is proved that interleaving delay can be significantly reduced by error and erasure decoding (EED). This paper proposes an erasure marking technique to enhance the reliability of the erasure information in order to completely exploit the capability of EED for interleaving delay reduction. Selection of proper parameters for the proposed erasure marking technique is analyzed. Simulation results show that the proposed technique can guarantee efficient erasure marking and reduce the interleaving delay by a factor of two.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.823
Threshold uncertainty score0.526

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Line Communications and NoiseFrench-language works237,207