Effect of voluntary exercise on peripheral tissue glucocorticoid receptor content and the expression and activity of 11β-HSD1 in the Syrian hamster
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent findings indicate that elevated levels of glucocorticoids (GC), governed by the expression of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11beta-HSD1) and GC receptors (GR), in visceral adipose tissue and skeletal muscle lead to increased insulin resistance and the metabolic syndrome. Paradoxically, evidence indicates that aerobic exercise attenuates the development of the metabolic syndrome even though it stimulates acute increases in circulating GC levels. To investigate the hypothesis that training alters peripheral GC action to maintain insulin sensitivity, young male hamsters were randomly divided into sedentary (S) and trained (T) groups (n = 8 in each). The T group had 24-h access to running wheels over 4 wk of study. In muscle, T hamsters had lower 11beta-HSD1 protein expression (19.2 +/- 1.40 vs. 22.2 +/- 0.96 optical density, P < 0.05), similar 11beta-HSD1 enzyme activity (0.9 +/- 0.27% vs. 1.1 +/- 0.26), and lower GR protein expression (9.7 +/- 1.86 vs. 15.1 +/- 1.78 optical density, P < 0.01) than S hamsters. In liver, 11beta-HSD1 protein expression tended to be lower in T compared with S (19.2 +/- 0.56 vs. 21.4 +/- 1.05, P = 0.07), whereas both enzyme activity and GR protein expression were similar. In contrast, visceral adipose tissue contained approximately 2.7-fold higher 11beta-HSD1 enzyme activity in T compared with S (12.9 +/- 3.3 vs. 4.8 +/- 1.5% conversion, P < 0.05) but was considerably smaller in mass (0.24 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.71 +/- 0.06 g). Thus the intracellular adaptation of GC regulators to exercise is tissue specific, resulting in decreases in GC action in skeletal muscle and increases in GC action in visceral fat. These adaptations may have important implications in explaining the protective effects of aerobic exercise on insulin resistance and other symptoms of the metabolic syndrome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".