MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059325162 · doi:10.7202/058046ar

Des savoirs de femmes sur les nouvelles techniques de reproduction

2005· article· fr· W2059325162 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Geneviève Daudelin

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches féministes · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesReproductionArtBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'auteure présente une partie des résultats d'une recherche effectuée sur les représentations sociales des nouvelles techniques de reproduction (NTR) chez des femmes ayant recouru à la médecine de la reproduction. Loin d'être univoque ou simple reproduction d'une logique médicale ou technicienne, le savoir des femmes est diversifié et complexe. Cinq représentations sont exposées, bien distinctes les unes des autres. Les NTR y apparaissent successivement comme des « moyens de contrôle », de l'« excès », des « moyens d'assistance et de réification », des « moyens d'expression de l'individualité » et, enfin, comme une « épreuve ».

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.193
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches féministesSame topicReproductive Health and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207