WE-E-213CD-08: A Novel Level Set Active Contour Algorithm Using the Jensen-Renyi Divergence for Tumor Segmentation in PET
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Positron emission tomography (PET) presents a valuable resource for delineating the biological tumor volume (BTV) for image-guided radiotherapy. However, accurate and consistent image segmentation is a significant challenge within the context of PET, owing to its low spatial resolution and high levels of noise. Active contour methods based on the level set methods can be sensitive to noise and susceptible to failing in low contrast regions. Therefore, this work evaluates a novel active contour algorithm applied to the task of PET tumor segmentation. METHODS: A novel active contour segmentation algorithm based on maximizing the Jensen-Renyi Divergence between regions of interest was applied to the task of segmenting lesions in 7 patients with T3-T4 pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. The algorithm was implemented on an NVidia GEFORCE GTV 560M GPU. The cases were taken from the Louvain database, which includes contours of the macroscopically defined BTV drawn using histology of resected tissue. The images were pre-processed using denoising/deconvolution. RESULTS: The segmented volumes agreed well with the macroscopic contours, with an average concordance index and classification error of 0.6 ± 0.09 and 55 ± 16.5%, respectively. The algorithm in its present implementation requires approximately 0.5-1.3 sec per iteration and can reach convergence within 10-30 iterations. CONCLUSIONS: The Jensen-Renyi active contour method was shown to come close to and in terms of concordance, outperforms a variety of PET segmentation methods that have been previously evaluated using the same data. Further evaluation on a larger dataset along with performance optimization is necessary before clinical deployment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".