The effect of oxidative stress on the bursopentin peptide structure: a theoretical study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bursopentin (BP(5), H-Cys(1)-Lys(2)-Arg(3)-Val(4)-Tyr(5)-OH), found in the bursa Fabricius of the chicken, is a pentapeptide that protects the organism from oxidative stress by reducing the intracellular generation of reactive oxygen species. Hydrogen abstraction, a common oxidative reaction occurring in proteins, often results in the formation of d amino acid residues. To study the effect of this phenomenon on the structure of bursopentin, each of its residues were converted from the l configuration to the d configuration, and the structures of these peptide epimers were compared to that of the wild-type bursopentin. The conformations, secondary structures, compactness and hydrogen bonding of bursopentin were compared to its epimers using molecular dynamics simulations and first principles quantum chemical computations. It was discovered that the repulsion between the side chains of Lys(2) and Arg(3) influenced the conformation of the peptide regardless of the configuration of these residues. Epimerisation of the Val(4) and Tyr(5) caused a reduction in the compactness of bursopentin. In all cases, the occurrence of a turn structure was relatively high, especially when Arg(3) was in the d configuration. Thermodynamic analysis of the epimerisation process showed that the formation of d amino acid residues is favourable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".