MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059445006 · doi:10.1139/v07-130

Interlayer grafting of glycidol (2,3-epoxy-1-propanol) on kaolinite

2008· article· en· W2059445006 on OpenAlex
Sadok Letaı̈ef, Christian Detellier

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicClay minerals and soil interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlycidolGraftingChemistryIntercalation (chemistry)KaoliniteEpoxyPolymer chemistryMoietyNuclear chemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysisMineralogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An organic–inorganic nanohybrid material was prepared by grafting glycidol (2,3-epoxy-1-propanol) on the interlayer aluminol groups of kaolinite (K) using DMSO–K precursor as a starting material. The results of the physicochemical characterization of the synthesized materials (XRD, FTIR, DTA–TG, 13 C and 29 Si CP/MAS NMR) confirm that the grafting reaction of glycidol involved the opening of the oxirane ring. The resulting nanohybrid material is similar to the one obtained by the interlayer grafting of glycerol (M. Janek, K. Emmerich, S. Heissler, and R. Nüesch. Chem. Mater. 19, 684, (2007)). Approximately, one glycidol moiety is grafted on each structural unit of kaolinite to afford a material with the chemical composition Al 2 Si 2 O 5 (OH) 4 [C 3 H 6 O 2 ] 0.9 .Key words: clays, clay minerals, kaolinite, intercalation, grafting, nanohybrid materials, DMSO, glycidol, glycerol, oxirane.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it