MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059445431 · doi:10.1080/14767050903194438

Respiratory syncytial virus risk factors in late preterm infants

2009· article· en· W2059445431 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marcello Lanari, Michela Silvestri, Giovanni A. Rossi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPalivizumabMedicinePediatricsGestational ageBirth weightAttendanceLow birth weightRisk factorRespiratory systemPregnancyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The key role of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in causing infant morbidity and hospitalizations is worldwide well recognized. The late preterm infants (34-36 weeks of gestational age (WGA)) showed a higher risk of hospitalization for RSV-induced infection as compared with full-term infants and similar to that seen in very preterm infants. In addition to the prematurity, a number of risk factors have been identified in 33-35 WGA infants that are associated with RSV-hospitalization as demonstrated by the Canadian and the Spanish studies. However, prematurity per se is not the only factor, since RSV-hospitalization in the first year of life also occurs in numerous full-term and previously healthy infants. Indeed, a recent case-control study on mostly full-term children showed that chronological age at the beginning of RSV season, low birth weight, and birth order (>or=1 sibling) were associated with a higher likelihood to acquire RSV-induced LRTI, severe enough to lead to hospital admission. In order to maximize the cost effectiveness of immunoprophylaxis with palivizumab, the American Academy of Pediatrics have recently updated recommendations resulting in a restriction of its use to infants at highest risk of hospitalization during times when RSV is most likely to be circulating (i.e. in the first 3 months of life for late preterm infants). According to a variety of epidemiologic data in this gestational age group, the risk of exposure should include day-care attendance and having a sibling <5 years of age. However, in an Italian study, in addition to chronological age at the beginning of RSV season, birth weight and birth order were significant predictors for RSV infection with hospitalization. On the basis of the finding that among nations the difference for severe RSV may exist in environmental and demographic risk factors, an 'International' tool has been developed based on the data from the Spanish FLIP study to predict the likelihood of RSV-hospitalization in newborns 33-35 WGA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal MedicineSame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207