MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

George Akerson's Legacy: Continuity and Change in White House Press Operations

2008· article· en· W2059448304 on OpenAlex
Charles E. Walcott, Karen M. Hult

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePresidential Studies Quarterly · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicElectoral Systems and Political Participation
Canadian institutionsInstitute on Governance
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite (mutation)OutreachPolitical scienceDiversification (marketing strategy)Media studiesSociologyLawBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growth and structural evolution of the White House press office have been primarily responses to the burgeoning and diversification of the mass communications media. As the White House press corps has grown, the press office adapted through expansion and structural elaboration. At the same time, the emergence of an increasingly complex media culture, partly a result of technological changes, called into question the role of traditional press and press relations within the overall White House communications and public outreach apparatus. As a consequence, while the press office has remained a central component of the White House Office and has evolved to meet new demands, its organizational location and, to some extent, its influence have varied within and across administrations. Meanwhile, organizational precedents and the institutional memories of those in and out of the White House have helped dampen major changes in structuring for communications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.840

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it