MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059467009 · doi:10.7202/013480ar

Pratique d’enseignement et d’apprentissage avec les TIC in situ pour des futurs enseignants francophones du Nouveau-Brunswick

2006· article· fr· W2059467009 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des sciences de l éducation · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Tools and Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Une nouvelle pratique d’enseignement et d’apprentissage a été conçue et mise à l’essai dans le cadre d’un cours avancé sur l’utilisation des TIC destiné à de futurs enseignants francophones. Pour l’élaborer, nous avons pris appui sur trois modèles qui soulignent l’importance de la cohérence entre la théorie et la pratique. Une étude de cas a été menée auprès de huit futurs enseignants. Les données du questionnaire et des journaux réflexifs ont permis de constater que, si certains futurs enseignants apprécient une formation axée sur la conception d’un projet de collaboration avec des enseignants en exercice, cette tâche s’avère plus ardue pour d’autres. En outre, la majorité a apprécié recevoir un ordinateur portatif pour parfaire ses compétences technologiques et pédagogiques des TIC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.569
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it