MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059501286 · doi:10.3109/02813432.2010.524811

“Caring for people where they are”: Addressing the double challenge of general practice at the 17th Nordic Congress of General Practice in Tromsø 2011

2010· editorial· en· W2059501286 on OpenAlexaff
Ivar J. Aaraas, Irene Hetlevik, Gisle Roksund, Svein Steinert

Bibliographic record

VenueScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care · 2010
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, psychology, and well-being
Canadian institutionsNordic Life Science Pipeline (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral practiceMedicineFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At the first Nordic Congress of General Practice in Copenhagen in 1979 Christian Borchgrevink, the first professor of general practice in Norway, stated in his key note lecture:Research is importan...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0170.009
Open science0.0060.004
Research integrity0.0370.052
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.388 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScandinavian Journal of Primary Health CareSame topicHealth, psychology, and well-beingFrench-language works237,207