A pharmacokinetic study of intermittent rifabutin dosing with a combination of ritonavir and saquinavir in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: Our primary aim was to evaluate the plasma exposures and safety of rifabutin and its active 25-O-desacetyl metabolite during concomitant therapy of intermittent rifabutin dosing regimens with a combination of ritonavir and saquinavir. METHODS: Twenty-four patients without mycobacterial infection who were human immunodeficiency virus seropositive and who were receiving 400 mg each of ritonavir and saquinavir twice daily participated in a 3-period, 2-group longitudinal pharmacokinetic study. Patients were equally randomized to receive 300 mg of rifabutin every 7 days (group 1) or 150 mg of rifabutin every 3 days (group 2) for 8 weeks. Blood samples were collected over the dosing intervals of the protease inhibitors at baseline (period 1) and of the 3 drugs after 4 weeks (period 2) and 8 weeks (period 3) for HPLC measurement of plasma concentrations of the 3 drugs and 25-O-desacetylrifabutin. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (group 1, n = 10; group 2, n = 9) completed the study. Five individuals withdrew from the study; 3 of them experienced side effects, and 2 were lost to follow-up. For combined groups, mean saquinavir and ritonavir overall (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]) and peak (C(max)) plasma exposures averaged over periods 2 and 3 did not change significantly (8% to 19%; P > .05) compared with those in period 1 (90% confidence intervals, -7% to 26% for ritonavir and -2% to 38% for saquinavir). Rifabutin and metabolite AUC and C(max) exposures were stable over the 8 weeks, with intraindividual coefficients of variation of 12% to 19%. Oral clearance of rifabutin was similar in both groups (321 mL/min in group 2 versus 372 mL/min in group 1; P = .34). Rifabutin C(max) values were significantly lower in group 2 (310 ng/mL versus 496 ng/mL in group 1; P = .004). Rifabutin and metabolite predose levels were significantly higher in group 2 (rifabutin: 54 ng/mL versus 17 ng/mL; desacetyl rifabutin: 55 ng/mL versus 28 ng/mL; P < .002). CONCLUSIONS: Rifabutin exposures were similar at 4 and 8 weeks and had minimal effect on ritonavir and saquinavir exposures. Intermittent rifabutin dosing over 8 weeks provided a safe and manageable regimen for concurrent therapy with a combination of ritonavir and saquinavir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".