MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059523724 · doi:10.1021/ja003371o

Laser Flash Photolysis Study of Jacobsen Catalyst and Related Manganese(III) Salen Complexes. Relevance to Catalysis

2001· article· en· W2059523724 on OpenAlexaff
María J. Sabater, Mercedes Álvaro, Hermenegildo Garcı́a, Emilio Palomares, J. C. Scaiano

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryFlash photolysisHeterolysisPhotochemistryLigand (biochemistry)HomolysisReactivity (psychology)Intramolecular forcePhotodissociationCatalysisStereochemistryRadicalOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The laser flash photolysis and emission properties of a set of five-coordinate manganese(III) Schiff-base complexes have been examined. In contrast to the intramolecular electron transfer between Mn3+ and the equatorial salen ligand reported to occur in the absence of axial coordination, our laser flash photolysis study has shown that the reactivity of the respective excited states is appreciably influenced by the electron donor strength of the apical ligand at the metal center. In fact, homolytic and heterolytic photocleavage of the metal-ligand apical bond can be the most important processes upon laser excitation, their relative contribution being influenced by medium effects and the sigma-charge donation of the axial ligand. On the other hand, the detection of reactive intermediates such as the oxomanganese(V) salen complex (lambda(max) 530 nm) by laser flash photolysis opens the way to apply this fast detection technique to the study of reaction mechanisms in catalysis by metallic complexes. As a matter of fact, quenching of oxomanganese(V) salen by simple alkenes has been observed by laser flash.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine ChemistryFrench-language works237,207