Image schemata - a guiding principle for multi-modal expression in performance design
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractAlthough stage performance has long been the subject for literary and critical analyses, it is only recently that formal computational methods and representations have been developed to this arena. Theatrical representation continues to evolve towards the use of increasingly multiple forms of expression, with the integration of new media technologies such as live video footage, computer-enhanced sound and light design and the more recent introduction of remote and virtual imaging capabilities. In this work, we report on the use of ideas resulting from a multi-disciplinary cross-pollination of cognitive and geomatics science to assist in the development of thematic material across many different performance modalities, including song, dialogue, music, dance, and set design. The particular method developed and proposed here draws on research within cognitive science concerning what are called image schemata. Image schemata, rooted in our spatial learning, are cultural universals that humans use auto...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it