MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059606238 · doi:10.2310/7070.2002.21091

Tracheotomy: Changing Indications and a Review of 1130 Cases

2002· review· en· W2059606238 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Otolaryngology · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTracheal and airway disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTracheotomyMedicineAirway obstructionMechanical ventilationComplicationSurgeryAirwayLaryngotracheal stenosisTracheal StenosisIntubationMortality rateGeneral surgeryAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Tracheotomy is one of the oldest known operations, dating back to ancient Egypt and India some 3000 years ago. The indications for tracheotomy have changed and expanded during the twentieth century. Today, owing to advancements in intensive care and the widespread use of mechanical ventilation, tracheotomy is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures and is encountered on a regular basis by hospital physicians in all fields. We present one of the largest series of consecutive tracheotomies spanning one decade. We review and discuss the modern indications for tracheotomy and emphasize the changes in these indications over the past century. METHODS: A retrospective study of 1,130 consecutive tracheotomies performed over one decade is presented. We studied the indications for surgery, the complications and mortality rate, and the various hospital departments requiring tracheotomies. RESULTS: A total of 1,130 tracheotomies were performed: 859 to assist in mechanical ventilation, 124 as an adjunct to head and neck or chest surgery, and 68 to relieve upper airway obstruction. Major complications occurred in 49 of the cases, and there were 8 deaths directly attributed to the tracheotomies. The most common complication was tracheal stenosis, occurring in 21 cases. Hemorrhage was the second most common complication, occurring in 9 cases. CONCLUSION: Tracheotomy, once used almost exclusively to bypass upper airway obstruction, is now a very common elective therapeutic procedure used mostly to facilitate prolonged intubation and ventilation of the critically ill. Today tracheotomy is not and should not be an emergency procedure owing to the huge complication and mortality rate of emergency tracheotomy and the existence of alternative routes to obtain immediate airway control in the acutely obstructed upper airway.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it