MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059622681 · doi:10.1039/b207896a

Determination of mercury by continuous flow cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry using micromolar concentration of sodium tetrahydroborate as reductant solution

2002· article· en· W2059622681 on OpenAlexafffund
Yuwei Chen, Tong Jian, Alessandro D’Ulivo, Nelson Belzile

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Analyst · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMercury impact and mitigation studies
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryDilutionMercury (programming language)Analytical Chemistry (journal)HydrideMatrix (chemical analysis)SodiumDetection limitFluorescenceInorganic chemistryChromatographyMetal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Systematic experiments were conducted to evaluate and compare the analytical figures of merit of two reducing agents (SnCl2 and NaBH4) in a continuous flow cold vapor atomic fluorescence mercury analyzer. It was found that sodium tetrahydroborate can efficiently reduce Hg2+ in various environmental samples at a concentration as low as 10 microM (ca. 3.8 x 10(-5)% w/v). Most commonly encountered transition metals (Fe2+, Fe3+, Zn2+, Cu2+, Ni2+, Pb2+ and Cr3+) did not interfere with total Hg determination. No interference from hydride-forming elements (Se4+, Sb3+ and As3+) was observed. Interference caused by Mn2+ and Ag+ could be readily removed by dilution and by using appropriate modification of the reaction matrix. A higher concentration of NaBH4 (0.1 M) is stable for I month when stored in the NaOH matrix (0.2 M) and at low temperature (4 degrees C). A working solution of NaBH4 can be freshly prepared by dilution. With NaBH4, the whole continuous flow system is kept clean much more easily as no precipitate is formed, which in turn considerably reduces memory effects, simplifies analytical operation and reduces the chemical cost six-fold.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.682

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe AnalystSame topicMercury impact and mitigation studiesFrench-language works237,207