MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059623122 · doi:10.4161/cc.3.10.1202

Magnifying Stem Cell Lineages: The Stop-EGFP Mouse

2004· article· en· W2059623122 on OpenAlexaff
Simon Weonsang Ro

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Cycle · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyGreen fluorescent proteinStem cellCell biologyLive cell imagingCellLineage (genetic)Cell fate determinationGeneticsMolecular biologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cell fate mapping techniques which can label clonal cell lineages are of importance because they allow one to investigate the distribution and types of daughter cells arising from single precursor cells. Thus, the potential of precursor cells to generate various types of descendent cells can be studied at the single-cell level. The stop-EGFP transgenic mouse carries a premature stop codon-containing enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) gene as a target gene for mutations. A cell having undergone a mutation at the premature stop codon and its descendant cell lineage will express EGFP, thus a clonal cell lineage can be traced in vivo using a fluorescent microscope. Using the stop-EGFP mouse, stem cell clonal lineages in the mouse dorsal epidermis can be investigated in vivo and repeated analyses of the same cell lineages can be performed over time. In vivo imaging studies possible with the stop-EGFP mouse provide new insights into the structure of epidermal proliferative units (EPUs). The stop-EGFP system provides a novel tool for investigating clonal cell lineages in developmental studies as well as in stem cell biology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell CycleSame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207