MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059625057 · doi:10.1021/ma0007684

Synthesis of Meth(acrylate) Diblock Copolymers Bearing a Fluorescent Dye at the Junction Using A Hydroxyl-Protected Initiator and the Combination of Anionic Polymerization and Controlled Radical Polymerization

2001· article· en· W2059625057 on OpenAlexaff
Jiang‐Dong Tong, Chunlin Zhou, Shaoru Ni, Mitchell A. Winnik

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopolymerPolymer chemistryAnthraceneAtom-transfer radical-polymerizationAcrylatePolymerizationChemistryRadical polymerizationMethacrylateReversible addition−fragmentation chain-transfer polymerizationAlkylMonomerLiving free-radical polymerizationAnionic addition polymerizationChain transferPhotochemistryPolymerOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The synthesis of well-defined poly(methyl methacrylate)- b -poly(alkyl acrylate) diblock copolymers with a single fluorescent dye molecule (phenanthrene or anthracene) at the junction was investigated. The first block was prepared by the anionic polymerization (AP) of (meth)acrylate in THF at −78 °C, using the 3-( tert -butyldimethylsilyloxy)-1-propryllithium/1-aryl-1-phenylethylene (aryl = 2-phenanthryl or 2-anthryl) monoadduct as the initiator. After the end group of the first block was transformed into α-bromoester, the diblock copolymer was formed by the atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of the second methacrylate monomer using the first block as the initiator. The block copolymers were characterized by GPC, UV, and NMR. We found that the synthesis of anthracene-labeled diblock copolymer was perturbed by the reaction of the propagating poly(alkyl acrylate) radical with anthracene. Consequently, this synthesis has to start from the anionic polymerization of tert -butyl acrylate, followed by chain extension to poly(methyl methacrylate) by ATRP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.679

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207