Steric and Electronic Influence on Photochromic Switching of N,C‐Chelate Four‐Coordinate Organoboron Compounds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A four-coordinate organoboron compound B(ppy)Mes(2) (1, ppy=2-phenylpyridyl, Mes=mesityl) was previously found to undergo reversible photochromic switching through the formation/breaking of a C-C bond, accompanied by a dramatic color change from colorless to dark blue. To understand this unusual phenomenon, a series of new four-coordinate boron compounds based on the ppy-chelate ligand and its derivatives have been synthesized. In addition, new N,C-chelate ligands based on benzo[b]thiophenylpyridine and indolylpyridine have also been synthesized and their boron compounds were investigated. The crystal structures of most of the new compounds were determined by X-ray diffraction analysis. UV/Vis, NMR, and electrochemical methods were used to monitor the photoisomerization process. DFT calculations were performed for all compounds to understand the photophysical and electronic properties of this class of molecules. The results of our study showed that the bulky mesityl group is necessary for photochromic switching. Electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups on the ppy chelate have a distinct impact on the photoisomerization rate and the photochemical stability of the molecule. Furthermore, we have found that the non-ppy-based N,C-chelate ligands such as benzo[b]thiophenepyridyl can also promote photoisomerization of the boron chromophore in the same manner as the ppy chelate, but the product is thermally unstable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".