A robust method for coupling detection among process variables
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Investigating complex interaction patterns among multiple process variables (PVs) is an important task. This paper demonstrates a robust method to estimate direction and strength of interactions among process variables. The method captures rapid changes in process variables through wavelet analysis. It uses single degree of freedom (SDOF) modelling to approximate a non-linear system in terms of linear damped forced oscillators. Phase interaction theory then extracts coupling direction and strength among process variables. The robustness of the proposed technique is verified on simulated Van der Pol oscillators with known directionality and coupling strength with varying signal to noise ratio (SNR). The effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed method have also been demonstrated on simulated data emanating from Canada Deuterium Uranium (CANDU) nuclear power plant steam generator level control mechanism. The extracted patterns of interaction structure among PVs aid to uncover the polishing mechanisms and provide more insights to investigate fault propagation scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it