MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059711088 · doi:10.7169/facm/2012.46.2.9

Some arithmetic identities involving divisor functions

2012· article· en· W2059711088 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFunctiones et Approximatio Commentarii Mathematici · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAnalytic Number Theory Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSigmaInteger (computer science)Divisor (algebraic geometry)MathematicsDivisor functionArithmeticCombinatoricsMultipleDiscrete mathematicsComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For a positive integer $n$, let $\sigma(n):= \sum_{d \in \mathb{N}, d|n} d$. The explicit evaluation of such arithmetic sums as $\sum_{(a,b,c) \in \ABIFnn^3, a+2b+4c=n} \sigma(a)\sigma(b) \sigma(c)$ and $\sum_{(a,b) \in \ABIFnn^2, a+2b=n} a \sigma(a)\sigma(b)$ is carried out for all positive integers $n$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it