Chelate and Pincer Carbene Complexes of Rhodium and Platinum Derived from Hexaphenylcarbodiphosphorane, Ph<sub>3</sub>PCPPh<sub>3</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reaction of [(cod)RhCl]2 with Ph3P=C=PPh3 (1) gave the bidentate Rh(I) carbene complex, (cod)Rh[eta2-C{P(C6H4)Ph2}{PPh3}] (2), in which one of the Ph groups in 1 underwent orthometalation to form the chelate. Displacement of cod by 2 equiv of PMe3 transformed 2, via a second orthometalation event, into the Rh(III) C,C,C pincer carbene complex, HRh(PMe3)2[eta3-C{P(C6H4)Ph2}2] (3). The reaction of [Me2Pt(SMe2)]2 with 1 led directly to the analogous C,C,C pincer carbene complex of Pt(II), (Me2S)Pt[eta3-C{P(C6H4)Ph2}2] (4). DFT calculations on a model form of 3 suggest a net single sigma-bonding interaction between Rh and an sp2-hybridized carbene center, with a HOMO that is predominantly carbene pz in character.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".