Wide Gap Brazing of IN 738 With Boron Free Ni-Co-Zr-Hf-Cr-Ti-Al Braze Alloy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, a new boron and silicon free braze alloy, based on Ni-Co-Zr-Hf-Cr-Ti-Al, was used to repair IN 738 superalloy employing a wide gap brazing (WGB) process under two process conditions. It was found that using a combination of Hf and Zr primarily as melting point depressants the amount of each melting point depressant (MPD) could effectively be reduced while still achieving a relatively low liquidus. During WGB process, the new braze alloy was able to bond IN 738 filler powder particles to each other and to the substrate cast IN 738 and achieve defect free joint. The microstructure analysis showed the presence of Zr-containing phase(s) remained in WGB joint, however, the hardness of the Zr-containing phase(s) was similar to that of superalloy substrate. Extended brazing cycle had limited effect on reducing the Zr-containing phase(s); rather it encouraged the formation of larger eutectic γ/γ′ phases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".