Higher order structure of the PCM adjacent to the centriole
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The centrosome is the major microtubule organizing center in most animal cells. This cytoplasmic organelle consists of two components : a mature centriole (or a pair of centrioles) and a mass of pericentriolar material (PCM). The PCM has been described as either a cloud of material that encases the entire centriole or as a cluster of proteins divided into two subsets, one that adheres to the lateral surface of the centriole and another that extends outward from this region as a cloud of material. In contrast to these protein distribution patterns, we demonstrated in a previous study that a subset of proteins present within the PCM is integrated together to form a tube (PCM tube) with an open and closed end that is duplicated in concert with centrosome duplication. The present study was undertaken to determine if this tubular conformation represents proteins that are confined to the surface of the centriole or if it represents a subset of proteins within the cloud of material that extends outward from the centriole. We document that : (1) the PCM tube represents a portion of the PCM directly associated with the centriole; (2) the PCM tube has a specific and reproducible relationship to the polar structure of the centriole; (3) the tube is a site of cytoplasmic microtubule organization, and has a structure that influences the initial pattern of microtubule assembly within the juxta-centriolar region; and (4) the PCM tube has a structural relationship with respect to the centriole, which allows the simultaneous expression of centriole- and PCM-based functions (e.g., ciliogenesis and cytoplasmic microtubule organization). Based on these findings, we propose a new model of the PCM at the centriole. This model highlights the role played by the proximal end of the centriole in the nucleation and organization of centriole-associated PCM, and indicates that the centrosome has an overall polarity in the region of the centriole.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".