Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet essai a été écrit pour accompagner une exposition photographique consacrée à l’un des plus beaux monuments d’architecture de Syrie, construit par la princesse ayyubide Dayfat Khatun à Alep au début du xiii e siècle. Afin de rendre l’édifice compréhensible, la description physique des lieux est doublée d’une interprétation de la disposition spatiale des volumes architecturaux et des éléments décoratifs. Les trois inscriptions monumentales de l’édifice sont exploitées pour en tirer les éléments sémantiques nécessaires à la compréhension des oppositions fondamentales articulant les lieux : clôture/ouverture, obscurité/lumière, bas/haut, devoir/vouloir, pouvoir/savoir… Au passage, l’analyse d’un rébus figuratif permet d’accéder à un message relatif à l’illumination mystique par la lumière divine. L’analyse sémiotique résout ainsi l’une des énigmes de l’histoire de l’architecture orientale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".