MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Retrospective estimation of the birth prevalence for delayed onset disorders: application to cystic fibrosis in Nova Scotia

2000· article· en· W2059794838 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mei Chong, David C. Hamilton, David E.C. Cole

Bibliographic record

VenueStatistics in Medicine · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoDalhousie UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCystic Fibrosis Foundation
KeywordsNova scotiaMedicineCystic fibrosisPediatricsMaximum likelihoodEstimationDemographyStatisticsInternal medicineGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maximum likelihood methods are used to estimate the birth prevalence, the age-at-diagnosis distribution, and the number of infants born with CF in Nova Scotia over a 20 year period. The data were taken from a registry of CF cases, and, because of the delayed onset of symptoms, some CF affected individuals were not diagnosed by the end of the study period. A goodness-of-fit test for assessing whether the age-at-diagnosis distribution is stable over the 20 years is provided. These methods could be applied equally well to data on any genetic disorder with delayed onset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStatistics in MedicineSame topicCystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207