MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059800183 · doi:10.1002/pmic.200401162

The development of an algorithm for the mass spectral interpretation of phosphoproteins

2005· article· en· W2059800183 on OpenAlexaff
Yupeng Zhao, Yen‐Han Lin

Bibliographic record

VenuePROTEOMICS · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosphoproteinPhosphorylationPeptideAlgorithmInterpretation (philosophy)IonMass spectrometryMass spectrumComputer scienceChemistryComputational biologyCombinatorial chemistryBiological systemBiologyBiochemistryChromatographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extended from the peptide mapping method (Fenyo, D., Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2000, 11, 391-395) the proposed algorithm takes the mass information of a precursor ion to reconstruct all possible phosphorylated peptide sequences. The mass spectra of product ions from the corresponding precursor ion is then used and compared to the reconstructed sequences to deduce the most probable phosphoprotein. The proposed algorithm also predicts all possible combinations of phosphopeptides, which may serve as a clue for designing proper phosphorylation experiments to validate the existence of these peptides and the corresponding proteins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.643
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePROTEOMICSSame topicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207