MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059820717 · doi:10.1115/detc2011-48888

Modal Characterization of MEMS Switches via Output Only and Input/Output Identification Methods

2011· article· en· W2059820717 on OpenAlexafffund
Joel M. Book, Samuel F. Asokanthan

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 7: 5th International Conference on Micro- and Nanosystems; 8th International Conference on Design and Design Education; 21st Reliability, Stress Analysis, and Failure Prevention Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsModalMicroelectromechanical systemsModal analysisCantileverActuatorComputer scienceIdentification (biology)Modal testingSystem identificationSubspace topologyAcousticsNoise (video)SIGNAL (programming language)Characterization (materials science)Control theory (sociology)AlgorithmVibrationMaterials scienceEngineeringOpticsPhysicsStructural engineeringArtificial intelligenceData modeling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MEMS devices typically have moving or oscillating mechanical parts, and characterization of their dynamics, including their modal parameters, is highly desirable. This paper is concerned with experimental implementation of a Stochastic Subspace Identification (SSI) algorithm as well a base excitation based identification algorithm for experimental modal analysis of a micro-cantilever switch. A white noise signal applied to the built-in electrostatic actuator in the switches excited a response measured using microscanning Laser Doppler Vibrometry (LDV). In the case of identification via the SSI, only the output response was used while the base excitation based algorithm employed the input and the output signals. The modal parameters found using MACEC matched well with those predicted by theory, and the results obtained via the two experimental identification approaches are in good agreement, thus providing confidence in using the SSI approach for experimental modal analysis of MEMS structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.805
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 7: 5th International Conference on Micro- and Nanosystems; 8th International Conference on Design and Design Education; 21st Reliability, Stress Analysis, and Failure Prevention ConferenceSame topicForce Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207