Ruthenium(II) Complexes of Carboxylated Terpyridines and Dipyrazinylpyridines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract One‐pot preparations of carboxylated 2,2′;6′,2″‐terpyridine and 2,6‐dipyrazin‐2‐ylpyridine ligands are reported in free acid and ester forms, as well as their transformations to homoleptic Ru II complexes in very good yields. Density functional theory calculations of their geometry‐optimized structures enabled their comparison with crystal structures; although the gross features of the crystal structures were reproduced, they showed much variability and distortion. The spectroscopic and electrochemical properties were analyzed from the point of view of their geometry‐optimized structures, molecular orbital characteristics and electronic transitions, specifically to assess the effects of carboxylation and of inserting a phenylene spacer between the tridentate portion and the carboxyl group. The dipyrazinylpyridine complexes had HOMO levels stabilized by approximately 1 eV relative to the terpyridine analogues, and showed positive‐shifted electrochemical potentials and redshifted electronic absorptions. Phenylene spacers were found to act as electron‐donating groups, and the lowest‐energy UV/Vis transitions showed intraligand character.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".