MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059837433 · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.032726

Diffraction in resonant electron scattering from helical macromolecules: Effects of the DNA backbone

2005· article· en· W2059837433 on OpenAlexaff
Laurent G. Caron, Léon Sanche

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScatteringPhysicsDiffractionElectronMacromoleculePerpendicularMolecular physicsElectron diffractionElectron scatteringInterference (communication)Base pairConstructiveDNACrystallographyOpticsAtomic physicsChemical physicsQuantum mechanicsChemistryGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We recently developed a theoretical framework to treat low-energy electron scattering from helical macromolecules. In this article, we use this framework to extend our previous model of simple base-pair scatterers, organized into the DNA structure, to include the backbone. The internal diffraction pattern due to base pairs is still present, but addition of the backbone screens the base pairs by a factor of 2. More interestingly, the effect of constructive interference on the phosphate groups within the backbone itself is seen to be strong at lower energies. We perform a calculation for electrons incident perpendicular and parallel to the axis of a fragment and find comparable electron patterns on the phosphate groups at the surface of films consisting of vertically or horizontally arranged segments relative to the substrate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207