MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059855483 · doi:10.1142/s0218271809015734

TESTING FOR FEATURES IN THE PRIMORDIAL POWER SPECTRUM

2009· article· en· W2059855483 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics D · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCMB cold spotCosmic microwave backgroundCutoffSpectral densityComponent (thermodynamics)CurvatureGalaxyRange (aeronautics)Cosmic background radiationObservational cosmology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Well-known causality arguments show that events occurring during or at the end of inflation, associated with reheating or preheating, could contribute a blue component to the spectrum of primordial curvature perturbations, with the dependence k3. We explore the possibility that they could be observably large in CMB, LSS, and Lyman-α data. We find that a k3 component with a cutoff at some maximum k can modestly improve the fits (Δχ2 = 2.0, 5.4) of the low multipoles (ℓ ~ 10–50) or the second peak (ℓ ~ 540) of the CMB angular spectrum when the three-year WMAP data are used. Moreover, the results from WMAP are consistent with the CBI, ACBAR, 2dFGRS, and SDSS data when they are included in the analysis. Including the SDSS galaxy clustering power spectrum, we find weak positive evidence for the k3 component at the level of Δχ2′ = 2.4, with the caveat that the nonlinear evolution of the power spectrum may not be properly treated in the presence of the k3 distortion. To investigate the high-k regime, we use the Lyman-α forest data (LUQAS, Croft et al., and SDSS Lyman-α); here we find evidence at the level Δχ2′ = 3.8. Considering that there are two additional free parameters in the model, the above results do not give a strong evidence for features; however, they show that surprisingly large bumps are not ruled out. We give constraints on the ratio between the k3 component and the nearly scale-invariant component, r3 < 1.5, over the range of wave numbers 2.3 × 10-3 Mpc -1 < k < 8.2 Mpc -1. We also discuss theoretical models which could lead to the k3 effect, including ordinary hybrid inflation and double D-term inflation models. We show that the well-motivated k3 component is also a good representative of the generic spikelike feature in the primordial perturbation power spectrum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Modern Physics DSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207