MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059870449 · doi:10.7202/019291ar

Something to Sing About: A Preliminary List of Canadian Staged Dramatic Music Since 1867

2008· article· en· W2059870449 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Mary I. Ingraham

Bibliographic record

VenueIntersections Canadian Journal of Music · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheater, Performance, and Music History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRepertoireArtifact (error)MusicalScope (computer science)PoliticsHistoryVisual artsFoundation (evidence)Field (mathematics)MusicologyLiteratureArtPsychologyPolitical scienceArchaeologyComputer scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primary aim of this article is to introduce and present a preliminary list of Canadian staged dramatic music composed between 1867 and 2007 as a contribution to a previously under-cultivated field of Canadian cultural activity and research. More than simply an exercise in establishing a repertoire, this article approaches these works as important historical documents that articulate contemporaneous cultural, social, and political values over the past 140 years. Through a discussion of issues raised in determining genre and musical citizenship, the scope, nature, and history of these works lays a foundation for systematic research into this most important Canadian cultural artifact. To facilitate access to what is a substantial body of information, this preliminary list is offered in three formats: 1) alphabetically by composer’s surname; 2) alphabetically by the title of the work; and 3) chronologically by date of completion of the work. Compositions are identified across all formats by a Preliminary Ingraham Number (PIN) comprised of the composer’s surname and the date of completion of the work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.296

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0180.022
Science and technology studies0.0170.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntersections Canadian Journal of MusicSame topicTheater, Performance, and Music HistoryFrench-language works237,207