MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059883798 · doi:10.1080/15427951.2011.604289

NAViGaTOR: Large Scalable and Interactive Navigation and Analysis of Large Graphs

2011· article· en· W2059883798 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternet Mathematics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicComplex Network Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer Research
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsVisualizationComputer scienceWorkflowGraph drawingScalabilityGraphical user interfaceData visualizationGraph LayoutVariety (cybernetics)Memory footprintInteractive visualizationData miningDatabaseProgramming languageArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Network visualization tools offer features enabling a variety of analyses to satisfy diverse requirements. Considering complexity and diversity of data and tasks, there is no single best layout, no single best file format or visualization tool: one size does not fit all. One way to cope with these dynamics is to support multiple scenarios and workflows. NAViGaTOR (Network Analysis, Visualization & Graphing TORonto) offers a complete system to manage diverse workflows from one application. It allows users to manipulate large graphs interactively using an innovative graphical user interface (GUI) and through fast layout algorithms with a small memory footprint. NAViGaTOR facilitates integrative network analysis by supporting not only visualization but also visual data mining.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score0.565

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it