MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059894386 · doi:10.1143/ptps.159.260

Magnetization Plateau of the<i>S</i>= 1/2 Frustrated Heisenberg Chain with Period 3 Parity Invariant Exchange Modulation

2005· article· en· W2059894386 on OpenAlexaff
Kazuo Hida, Ian Affleck

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress of Theoretical Physics Supplement · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTheoretical and Computational Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsDegenerate energy levelsCondensed matter physicsPhase transitionMagnetizationPhase diagramSymmetry breakingQuantum mechanicsHeisenberg modelParity (physics)Ising modelPhase (matter)AntiferromagnetismMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The magnetization plateau of the S = 1/2 frustrated Heisenberg chain with period 3 parity invariant exchange modulation is investigated by the bosonization and numerical exact diagonalization method. The ground state phase diagram at 1/3 of the saturated magnetization is obtained. Among three degenerate ↑↑↓-type plateau states in the uniform chain, two of them (↓↑↑↓↑↑⋅⋅⋅ and ↑↓↑↑↓↑⋅⋅⋅) turned out to be robust against the period 3 exchange modulation which favors the phase up to a critical value of the modulation amplitude ( = singlet dimer) resulting in the Z2 symmetry broken phase. Another ↑↑↓-type state with ↑↑↓↑↑↓⋅⋅⋅ configuration is stabilized for period 3 modulation with opposite sign. The transition between the -phase and Z2-broken phase is the Ising transition and that between the ↑↑↓↑↑↓⋅⋅⋅ -phase and Z2 broken phase is the first order transition. The spin configuration in each phase is numerically verified by applying the local symmetry breaking field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProgress of Theoretical Physics SupplementSame topicTheoretical and Computational PhysicsFrench-language works237,207