MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059903360 · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e318199f6ad

Long-Term Follow-Up Experience with Carbonated Calcium Phosphate Cement (Norian) for Cranioplasty in Children and Adults

2009· article· en· W2059903360 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCranioplastyMedicineComplicationSeromaSurgeryDentistrySkull

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Despite the growing popularity of calcium-based bone cements as a cranioplasty material, the long-term success and complication rates of these materials remain largely controversial. The authors reviewed their extended experience with Norian, a carbonated calcium phosphate bone cement, for cranioplasty. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent cranioplasty using Norian over the past 9 years was conducted. Patients with less than 1 year of follow-up were excluded. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were studied. Follow-up averaged 43.9 months (range, 12.1 to 109.8 months). The overall complication rate was 26 percent, and included infection (n = 9), seroma (n = 1), or a chronically draining sinus (n = 2). Average time to onset of a complication was 20.2 months (range, 2.3 to 89.2 months). Two of nine infections resolved with oral antibiotics; the remaining complications required surgical intervention for definitive treatment. Factors associated with a statistically increased risk of complications were amounts of Norian used (p < 0.01) and onlay application with a high probability for bacterial contamination (p = 0.001), whereas reconstruction of full-thickness cranial defects larger than 25 cm trended toward worse outcomes (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Norian is well suited for cranioplasty when used in moderate amounts for onlay applications, as evidenced by acceptable complication rates and contouring ability in this setting. Its use in large amounts as an onlay, inlay full-thickness cranial reconstruction of large defects or areas with potential bacterial contamination should be avoided. Complications or construct failure may occur months or even years after implantation, even under ideal circumstances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.958

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it