TU‐G‐211‐03: Automatic Segmentation of Non‐Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Using 3D Texture Features in Co‐Registered FDG PET/CT Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the usage of a combination of FDG‐PET/CT features to improve automated segmentation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) in the thorax in order to reduce target definition uncertainty in radiotherapy. Methods: Features of co‐registered FDG‐PET/CT images of patients with non small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) were investigated using spatial gray‐level dependence matrices, neighborhood gray tone difference matrices, Tamura textures, first order statistics and structural characteristics. A training data set of PET and CT scans from 21 patients diagnosed with NSCLC was used. Feature samples were taken from regions of interest that included GTV, positive nodes and healthy structures found in the thorax. A decision tree incorporating KNN classifiers as nodes was trained to segment GTVs using an exhaustive search for the optimal combination of features by area under the curve (AUC) at each node. A validation set of 10 patients deemed difficult to contour was used and a probabilistic ground truth was derived from a combination of three observer contours using simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE).Results: The concordance index of the three observers was found to average 0.370. CT skewness and PET coarseness were found to be the most useful discriminators when evaluated independently with AUCs of 0.705 and 0.972 respectively. Evaluation of the segmentation results using Dice coefficients found the resulting DTKNN outperformed a variety of thresholds including signal‐to‐background ratio and an implementation of the 3‐FLAB algorithm. Dice coefficients for the DTKNN averaged 0.65 and reached as high as 0.84. Conclusions: Incorporation of texture features from both modalities offers an improvement in segmentation accuracy over approaches that utilize each modality independently. The largest source of error was found to be the misregistration of PET to CT volumes and blurring of PET due to internal motion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".