MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059957979 · doi:10.1029/2008eo030001

Exploring Arctic Transpolar Drift During Dramatic Sea Ice Retreat

2008· article· en· W2059957979 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Claude Gascard, Jean Festy, Hervé le Goff, Matthieu Weber, B. Bruemmer, Michael Offermann, M Doble, Peter Wadhams, R. Forsberg, Susan Hanson, Henriette Skourup, Sebastian Gerland, Marcel Nicolaus, Jean‐Philippe Métaxian, Jacques Grangeon, Jari Haapala, Eero Rinne, Christian Haas, Alfred Wegener, Georg Heygster, Erko Jakobson, Timo Palo, J. Wilkinson, Lars Kaleschke, K.J. Claffey, Bruce Elder, J. W. Bottenheim

Bibliographic record

VenueEos · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArctic sea ice declineClimatologyArctic ice packArcticSea iceArctic geoengineeringEnvironmental scienceGlobal warmingIce-albedo feedbackClimate changeThe arcticCryosphereArctic dipole anomalyOceanographyDrift iceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Arctic is undergoing significant environmental changes due to climate warming. The most evident signal of this warming is the shrinking and thinning of the ice cover of the Arctic Ocean. If the warming continues, as global climate models predict, the Arctic Ocean will change from a perennially ice‐covered to a seasonally ice‐free ocean. Estimates as to when this will occur vary from the 2030s to the end of this century. One reason for this huge uncertainty is the lack of systematic observations describing the state, variability, and changes in the Arctic Ocean.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.145 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations113
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEosSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207