MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059959602 · doi:10.1109/vtcfall.2014.6966008

Improved Iterative Detection of Multiuser Signals with Fast Frequency-Hopping Modulation

2014· article· en· W2059959602 on OpenAlexaff
Tung Nguyen, Ha H. Nguyen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingle antenna interference cancellationComputer scienceEncoderMultiuser detectionRelayInterference (communication)Decoding methodsElectronic engineeringSpectral efficiencyIterative methodAlgorithmChannel (broadcasting)Modulation (music)TelecommunicationsCode division multiple accessEngineeringAcousticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An improved iterative receiver is developed for multiuser communications using fast frequency-hopping modulation. Each user employs a channel encoder to protect its information and facilitate interference cancellation at the receiver. At the destination, in order to reliably extract signals from all users, the detection algorithm employs double iteration process: an outer iteration between the interference canceler and soft-input soft-output (SISO) decoder, and an inner iteration between the soft demapper and the SISO decoder. The proposed detection algorithm works with direct as well as relay-aided transmissions. Two relay scenarios are investigated, which are amplify-and-forward and partial-decode-and-forward relaying. Under the same spectral efficiency, simulation results demonstrate the excellent performance of the proposed receiver when compared to the performance of single iterative receiver and other previously-proposed interference cancellation schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.558
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207