MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2059978624 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2014.6946644

Towards the retrieval of multi-year sea ice thickness and deformation state from polarimetric C- and X-band SAR observations

2014· article· en· W2059978624 on OpenAlexaff
J Alec Casey, Justin Beckers, Thomas Busche, Christian Haas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynthetic aperture radarPolarimetryRemote sensingSea iceC bandGeologyBackscatter (email)RadarComputer sciencePhysicsScatteringClimatologyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In situ and airborne observations of sea ice properties are compared to polarimetric C- and X-band synthetic aperture radar images acquired in the Lincoln Sea in 2012 and 2013. A decision-tree classification algorithm is developed to separate level and deformed ice, as well as first- and multi-year ice (MYI), using parameters of the Freeman-Durden Decomposition. Preliminary qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the algorithm indicate it has considerable promise for the separation of these ice types. For the MYI class, correlations between backscatter and ice thickness were moderate to strong for the 2012 field observations but were weak for the 2013 field observations. Further research is required to determine whether or not MYI thickness can be inverted from polarimetric C- and X-band SAR data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→