MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059983606 · doi:10.2140/pjm.2005.218.343

A family of isochronous foci with Darboux first integral

2005· article· en· W2059983606 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePacific Journal of Mathematics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntegrable systemMathematicsFocus (optics)Center (category theory)HomogeneousClass (philosophy)PolynomialPure mathematicsAlgebraic numberDifferential (mechanical device)Mathematical physicsMathematical analysisCombinatoricsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the class of polynomial differential equations x ̇ = λx − y + Pn(x, y)+ P2n−1(x, y), y ̇ = x + λy + Qn(x, y)+ Q2n−1(x, y) with n ≥ 2, where Pi and Q i are homogeneous polynomials of degree i. These systems have a focus at the origin if λ 6 = 0, and have either a center or a focus if λ = 0. Inside this class we identify a new subclass of Darboux integrable systems having either a focus or a center at the origin. Under generic conditions such Darboux integrable systems can have at most two limit cycles, and when they exist are algebraic. For the case n = 2 and n = 3 we present new classes of Darboux integrable systems having a focus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it