MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059994082 · doi:10.4161/auto.8.1.18722

Autophagy links lipid metabolism to longevity in<i>C. elegans</i>

2012· article· en· W2059994082 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAutophagy · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Aging
FundersNational Institute on Aging
KeywordsAutophagyBiologyLongevityCell biologyLipid metabolismLife spanGermlineMechanism (biology)GeneticsEvolutionary biologyBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cellular recycling process of autophagy is emerging as a central player in many of the conserved longevity pathways in C. elegans, but the underlying mechanisms that link autophagy and life span remain unclear. In a recent study, we provided evidence to suggest that autophagy modulates aging through an effect on lipid homeostasis. Specifically, we identified a role for autophagy in a longevity model in which germline removal in C. elegans extends life span. Life-span extension in these animals is achieved, at least in part, through increased expression of the lipase LIPL-4. We found that autophagy and LIPL-4-dependent lipolysis are both upregulated in germline-less animals and work interdependently to prolong life span. While these genetic results lend further support to a growing link between autophagy and lipid metabolism, our findings are the first to suggest a possible molecular mechanism by which autophagy modulates organismal aging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.340
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it