MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059996008 · doi:10.1089/thy.2007.0199

Recognition of Thyroglobulin by T Cells: The Role of Iodine

2007· review· en· W2059996008 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThyroid · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThyroglobulinIodineMedicineChemistryThyroidInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Among known autoantigens, thyroglobulin (Tg) is unique in its capacity to store iodine, an element provided in our daily diet. Evolutionary pressure has sculpted Tg into a large molecular scaffolding to allow organification of iodide and its incorporation into thyroid hormones. The increase in molecular size and the posttranslational modification by iodine had to exact immunological consequences. Over the last 15 years, numerous Tg peptides-targets of thyroiditogenic T cells-have been mapped, raising questions regarding the mechanisms that maintain or abrogate immune tolerance against this large autoantigen. This review summarizes the work in this area and discusses the role iodine may play in these processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.830

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it